ALSO, IN THE ABOVE IMAGES HE LOOKS KIND OF LIKE A MONKEY, MAYBE THAT’S WHY HE CAME UP WITH HIS THEORY………….LOL,

You will be to (at his theory) after you read this chapter !

As you can see by the above left picture/quote, Charles Darwin, by his own admission, greatly doubted his own theory !

So, you may ask, why then, did he re-create it ? That will be explored later.

Evolution attempts to explain Creation , in all its perfectly designed, precise, ordered , beautiful and diverse complexity, without a Creator.

It is remarkable because it is still widely accepted, and taught despite the lack of any observable scientific evidence for macro-evolution , which is evolution from one distinct kind of organism or kind into another . In addition , no evidence of past or present transitional species have ever been found . That is why you hear the often used term “ the missing link “ . Belief in something with no proof was a definition of Faith, religion or a Creator . I say was , because only recently, ALL sciences, including math and medicine, as just documented , and in the next few chapters will be documented, in the areas of ; astronomy , physics , deep-sea exploration , and archaeology, now give evidence of, a Creator .

Truly, we are living in The Information Age ! Because of Evolutionists belief, despite lack of proof , mimicking the previous established definition of faith , it becomes ironic that the theory that sought to take away the credit of The Creator, for Creation, relies on faith !

Here are a few statements of scientists , who are evolutionists , addressing this lack of evidence of macro-evolution (the changing of one distinct kind of organism into another) , the lack of evidence of “ transitional species “ that support this and lack of evidence that evolution is still going on now .

Obviously, it were a true , the process would still be happening . A current leading evolutionist , Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh was quoted as saying , “ …. it was and still is the case that with the exception of Dobzhansky’s claim of a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species by any mechanism has never been observed “ .

Ernst Mayr, the Dean of living evolutionist, long-time professor of biology at Harvard, who has alleged that evolution is a “ simple fact “ , nevertheless agrees that it is an “ historical science “ for which “ laws and experiments are inappropriate techniques “ by which to explain it .

Now evolutionists commonly answer the above criticism by claiming that Evolution goes to slowly for us to see it happening . They used to claim that the real evidence for evolution was the fossil record of the past , but the truth of the matter is the billions of known fossils do not include a single transitional form , structure or species in the process of evolving !

With respect to the origin of primitive life itself , leading researcher in this field , Leslie Orgel , after noting that neither proteins and nucleic acids could have arisen without the other , stated , “ so at first glance one might have to conclude that life could never in fact have originated by chemical means “ .

In other words , Life does not come from non-life !

Still fishing to make the theory work , Dr. Orgel speculates that RNA may have come first but then still admits that , “ the precise events giving rise to the RNA world remain unclear…. investigators have proposed many hypotheses but evidence in favor of each of them as fragmentary at best “ .

Still on a fishing expedition in the primordial soup is Stanley Miller’s famous experiment on a gaseous mixture in a ball that he gave an electric charge to,

had produced some crude amino acids and other fundamental complex molecules accumulated at the bottom of the apparatus . Indeed for some time it seems like this was something leading to creation of life in a test-tube . Unfortunately such experiments have not progressed much further than the original prototype , leaving evolutionists with a sour aftertaste from the primordial soup . Evolutionists insist life came from nothing, by chance .

The following description of what is required to make even the simplest of living cells, proves that is ridiculous !

To make even the simplest cell it takes at least 600 different protein molecules. Proteins are made of amino acids. A single functioning protein is typically made from a chain of between 50 to 1000 amino acids. Do the math. So the simplest cell requires 300 to 600,000 amino acids ! Infinitely more ingredients than any primordial soup recipe ! Some proteins require a chain of thousands of properly sequenced amino acids.

Every time a new amino acid is joined to a chain it must form a chemical bond, called a peptide bond, in order to successfully join with the other amino acids in the chain. Left-handed and right-handed amino acids are produced with the same frequency, but only left-handed amino acids can be selected for use in a chain to make a protein. Evolutionists have no explanation why proteins only used left-handed amino acids.

Every amino acid in the long chain also has to be a specific amino acid.

There are 20 different types that can be selected and they need to be placed in the correct order in the chain in order to form a protein.

The amino acids are placed in the exact order because of a molecule in the cell called DNA. DNA could be described as a master blueprint information code, program or special language that uses a four-letter chemical alphabet, all within a single molecule . The chemical letters are a code in DNA that are the set of instructions for the cells machines on how to correctly assemble amino acids, in chains, to build proteins.

If the DNA is not present from the very beginning, the amino acids will not be correctly selected and placed in the proper order.

As a result a protein will never form and the cell will not survive. DNA can’t function without at least 75 pre-existing proteins. But proteins are produced only by DNA , so since each need the other, they must have come into existence at the exact same time, by The Creator ! This one fact alone eliminates Evolution !

This is confirmed by leading researcher in this field , Leslie Orgel , after noting that neither proteins and nucleic acids could have arisen without the other, stated ,

“ so at first glance one might have to conclude that life could never in fact have originated by chemical means “ . A DNA fiber is only about two millions of a millimeter thick.

While DNA is not thick and is incredibly small, it is extremely long when uncoiled. In fact if the DNA in just one of your cells were uncoiled, connected and stretched out, it would be over seven feet long ! There is that number 7 again ! It would be so thin that its details could not be seen even under an electron microscope ! If all the DNA in your body were placed end-to-end it would stretch from here to the Moon more than five hundred thousand times. If you took a set of DNA from every person who ever lived and placed it in a pile it would weigh less than an aspirin yet the information storage density of DNA is many times greater than the most advanced supercomputer chip ! 

Bill Gates describe DNA saying quote “ DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created ” . But having the complex DNA instruction program by itself, is still worthless, other things in the cell must be able to understand and use DNA’s Information Program. In other words the highly complex DNA program is actually worthless unless there is also a system inside the cell that understands the complex DNA language program.

Like computers have anti-virus software there are special parts of the DNA todetect and correct errors. 

Special proofreading protein machines travel and run constantly up and down the DNA molecule, looking for any errors requiring correction. If any problems are detected, repairs are made immediately. This whole process is incredibly complex, yet automatic ! The complex information , contained in DNA proves life doesn’t just consist of random matter and energy .

It also contains a incredibly complex, multi-layered, self-correcting program, of highly specific details , to select and properly assemble the proper amino acids to form protein building blocks and then program those protein blocks to form cells !

This information can only come from an intelligence source that put the information there !

The incredibly specific, precise and detailed information program of DNA just described, is just for individual proteins . Remember to make even the simplest cell requires 600 proteins, so this entire multi-layered process needs to be duplicated 600 more times to create a living cell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

DNA’s precise, intricate and complex program for the blueprint of building life is only one evidence that has led scientists to admit it was intelligently designed, leading them to formulate the latest Theory of Creation, The Theory of Intelligent Design .

Now all we have to do is wait for the scientists to EVOLVE, so their arrogant pride can dissipate, to say it was Almighty God, The Creator , who designed it, after all ! Scientists who support The Theory of Intelligent Design see that this is all way to complex to ALL have happen by chance, as Evolutionists claim, so Evolution must be a religion to be believed solely on faith, since the above facts counter it’s believability !

Evolution, Survival of the fittest’ and ‘natural selection.’ No matter what phraseology one generates, the basic fact remains the same: any physical change of any size, shape or form is strictly the result of purposeful alignment of billions of nucleotides (in the DNA).

Nature or species do not have the capacity for rearranging them, nor adding to them. Consequently no leap (saltation) can occur from one species to another. The only way we know for a DNA to be altered is through a meaningful intervention from an outside source of intelligence, like The Creator, Almighty God, or now man, thru bio-engineering, trying to be Almighty God.

Neither can Evolutionists come up with a explanation on how one-celled organisms in this primordial soup would have evolved into the vast array of complex multi-celled invertebrates of the Cambrian Period , leading steadfast evolutionist Gould to admit, “ the Cambrian explosion was the most remarkable and puzzling event in the history of life “ .

Equally puzzling is how some invertebrate creatures , in the ancient ocean , with all its hard parts on the outside , managed to evolve into the first vertebrate , that is the first fish , with its hard parts all on the inside .

Once again no archaeological fossil record of a transitional species to support this .

A very bitter opponent of creation , science paleontologist , Niles Eldredge , has acknowledged , “ that there is little if any evidence of evolutionary transitions in the fossil record and that it is a simple irrefutable truth that virtually all members of a biota (biologic class or species) remain basically stable with minor fluctuations throughout their duration “ . To fill in gaps, Evolutionists draw the conclusions they want from the facts, for instance they would call the many different types of dogs such as a Great Dane and a Chihuahua, because of their major differences, are different species .

In another attempt for evolutionists to show species relation, to construct their evolutionary trees, they tried to use homologous structures, which are similar joint or muscle structures, like a hip knee or shoulder joint, common between different species.

Evolutionist try to say just because a joint, bone, muscle structure is common to more than one species, they are somehow related. That is like saying roller skates, a skateboard, a motorcycle and a car are all similar related things simply because they all have wheels and axles !

Evolutionists use this logic in another desperate attempt for them to construct their evolutionary trees (evolutionary family trees attempting to show how one species led to another). Fossils from key periods are often not intermediates but rather hodgepodges of defining features of many different groups . Furthermore the major groups are not assembled in a simple linear or progressive manner , but new features are often cut and pasted on different groups at different times !

These are not the only lack of ethics and credibility used to prove this false Theory.

Two of the most famous long-held proofs of evolution, the famous, Piltdown man and Nebraska man were falsely pieced together, manufactured and forged.

And even though there can be no fossil evidence of soft tissue like eyes, the eyes of the famous Lucy were depicted as being white, to make her look more human than the eyes of apes and monkeys, which are yellowish brown. This appears even more desperate when you consider she was only three foot tall and had a brain the third the size of humans which basically makes her a chimpanzee!

Our DNA is different from that of each of the apes, monkeys, and all the rest. The number of vertebrae in our backbone is different from that in the apes. 

Our cranial (brain) capacity is totally different from the great apes . Orangutans……………….275-500cc. Chimpanzees………..275-500cc. Gorillas…………….360-752cc. Man……………….1100-1700cc.

Gorillas are much larger than humans, so why is there brain so much smaller, if we are related.

So much for scientific standards of credibility ! The physical characteristics of higher vertebrates is essentially the same in form, design, and constituency, as mans.

The brains of whales, elephants and dolphins is much larger than mans.

When confronted with these facts, Evolutionists have no answer why there is such an tremendous difference in the Mind of man and the mind of animals ! This is another huge flaw in Evolution ! Without the explanation of The Creators, giving us the “ Spirit of Man “ that gives us this “ understanding “ to think, reason, create, to possess intellect, they have no understanding ! Job 32:8 states, “ But it is a Spirit of Man, And the breath of the Almighty gives them(Humans) understanding. “ This is the real difference in man from the animals. 

It is very interesting to note humans use only between 5 and 10% of their brain capacity.

In NO OTHER life-form is this the case.

What could possibly be the reason for this ?

Could it be the Genesis 1:27 has the answer ? “ so God created Mankind in his own image in the image of God he created them male and female… “

Could it be this 90 to 95% of unused brain capacity will be utilized after future transformation of his loyal followers from physical plane beings to spiritual, to teach the failed governments of the world how to live in peace, health and happiness, the way God intended ?

What else could possibly explain that humans are the only life form to have 90 to 95% of their brain unused ?

If anyone has a plausible answer I will listen.

Evolutionists say Modern man is said to have evolved until about 100,000 years ago—and then he stopped evolving !

Why did the Evolutionary switch get turned off ? It is claimed that, since that time, man has switched over from “physical evolution” to “cultural and social evolution”. This is an attempt to explain the fact that, in historical records, evolution has never been known among humans ! 

There is no evidence that evolution is now—or has ever—occurred among animals or plants either.

Are they culturally evolving now also ? In addition, it is strange that if man is essentially the same as he was a million years ago, then why did he only begin leaving writings, buildings, and artifacts during no more than the last few thousand years? Why does human history only go back less than 5,000 years ?

As far as a human intermediate species are concerned the Evolutionists evidence is sadly lacking as well.

All the paleoanthropologists have to show for more than a hundred years of digging are remains from fewer than two thousand of our ancestors and they have used this assortment of jawbones , teeth and fossilize scraps together with molecular evidence from living species to piece together a line of proposed human descent going back 5 to 8 million years, to the time when humans and chimpanzees supposedly diverged from a common ancestor .

Anthropologist try to supplement their extremely fragmentary fossil evidence with DNA and other types of genetic evidence from living animals to piece together their evolutionary scenario . Professor Lewin notes that , “ the overall effect is that molecular phylogenetics is by no means as straightforward as its pioneers believed ….

the Byzantine dynamics of genome change has many other consequences for molecular phylogenetics including the fact that different genes tell different stories “ . Once again no help for evolutionists , from this particular science either !

His colleague concludes pessimistically , “ even with DNA sequence data we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative imagination “ .

Another area of Evolutionary proof that has disappeared is, Vestigial parts or so-called evolutionary leftover parts such as the seldom-used pelvic bone-in whales was thought to be one of these, as evidence whales walked on land but , ironically in an issue of the journal “Evolution” was confessed to be used during mating !

Also thought Vestigial were tonsils, now we’ve discovered that they are the first line of defense against bacteria entering the airway through the mouth, tonsils , produce antibodies and enzymes that destroy bacteria and keep us from getting sick.

Another thorn in the side of Evolutionists is the human body part, once thought useless, the appendix, now discovered to be a storehouse for beneficial bacteria for digestion and the immune system. One by one researchers have discovered important uses for ALL the organs, 19 th-century Evolutionists thought were vestigial, useless leftovers from evolution !

The tailbone, thought to actually be remnants of a tail, now known to anchor tendons, ligaments and muscles that support the pelvic floor, stabilize a person when sitting and aid in balance.

All these things once thought useless, and evidence of Evolution, have now been discovered that they serve a purpose.

The Creator does nothing without purpose, for, speaking of humans, says, “ I am fearfully and wonderfully made “.Psalm 139:14.

So all of these evidences and arguments against evolution are in fact positive evidences of Creation !

As a last-ditch effort to save their Theory of evolution from the scientific garbage dump, evolutionists say similarities in DNA and other biochemical components of organisms as their proof that evolution is, in fact happening .

 A number of evolutionists have even argued that DNA itself is direct evidence for evolution since it is common for all organisms . Once again neither argument is valid . There is no reason whatsoever why The Creator could not or would not use the same type of genetic code , based on DNA , for all his creative living life forms . This is actually more evidence for the newest theory of creation called the “ Theory of Intelligent Design “ .

Still evolutionist ignore all these facts and devise preposterous, flawed circular reasoning to cling to their theory like a religion ! Here is a fitting quote from Professor James Harvey’s enlightening book, The Mind In The Making . It has a quote in it that says, “ We are incredibly heedless in the formation of our beliefs, but find ourselves with an illicit passion for them when anyone proposes to rob us of their companionship.

It is obviously not the ideas that threaten themselves that are dear to us, but our self-esteem which is threatened…..

the little word my is the most important one in human affairs and properly to reckon with it, is just the beginning of wisdom. It has the same force whether it is ; my dinner, my dog,my house or my faith, my country and my God.

We not only resent the implication that my watch is wrong or my car is shabby but that my conception of the Canals of Mars or the my pronunciation of Epictetus, ….. or the date of Sargon I, are subject to revision….. we like to continue to believe what we have been accustomed to accept as true, and the resentment aroused when doubt is cast upon any of our assumptions, leads us to seek every manner of excuse for clinging to it. The result is that most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believing as we already do ” . Basically all this says that the human mind tends to essentially form beliefs without research and then form outrageous arguments to stubbornly remain close-minded to the fact our beliefs are wrong !

In other words DENIAL, of even the most obvious TRUTHS !

Probably the biggest scientific evidence against evolution is one of the most fundamental laws of nature , “ the law of increasing entropy “ , also known as, “ The Second Law of Thermodynamics “ , which stipulates that all systems in the real world tend to go “ downhill “ , as it were , toward disorganization and decreased complexity .

This law of entropy is by any measure one of the most universal best-proved laws of nature and applies not only in the physical and chemical systems but also in biological and geological systems and in fact in all systems without exception .

 With a do-or-die attitude evolutionists try to get around the law of entropy by saying that it only applies to a closed system and that the Earth is an open system because of incoming energy from the sun , which is somehow able to sustain evolutionary progression throughout the ages , in spite of natural tendency of all systems to deteriorate toward disorganization .

These people base this claim on a so-called flaw in the second law of thermodynamics . They say “ the overall amount of disorder in a closed system cannot decrease , local order within a larger system can increase without the actions of an intelligent agent “ . This is an attempt to refute the impressive recent book , “ Intelligent Design ” by Professor W.A. Demski .

 This futile response to the law of entropy gives no explanation how the energy from the sun’s rays or it’s raw solar heat is a cause of increased complexity in any system , open or closed . In fact the best-known and most fundamental equation of thermodynamics says the influx of heat into an open system will increase the entropy of that system , not decrease it .

All known cases of decreased entropy in open systems involve a guided program of some sort and one or more energy conversion mechanisms .

Once again , this if anything , points back to the Theory of Intelligent Design .

People confuse Evolution with The Order of Natural Selection, which basically speaking is , survival of the fittest , whereby differences , within a species , that give advantage to a member of that species , to survive , such as longer legs to run faster to catch more pray , or larger ears to hear their prey . These genetic traits are naturally passed on to their offspring . These are not overall transmutation of species , nearly fine-tuning or tweaking of members within them . Now occasionally there are mutations or abnormalities , just as there are birth defects .Mutations are not organizing mechanisms but disorganizing , that are commonly harmful , sometimes neutral but never beneficial . Natural selection cannot generate order , at most it can filter out these disorganizing mutations presented , within the species , thereby conserving the existing order , but never generating new order .

 In summary , from the statements of evolutionists themselves , there is no real scientific evidence for evolution . The only observable evidence is of a very limited horizontal ( natural selection) or more often times downward changes( law of entropy) within the species . Natural selection only ensures the survival of the fittest, thereby ensuring the continuation of that species .

As stated at the beginning of the section the Theory of Evolution or Darwinism is more like a religion than a science , since it demands belief , despite the lack of scientific evidence !

Doctrinaire atheist evolutionist Richard Dawkins admits that atheism cannot be proved to be true and says , “ Of course we can’t prove there isn’t a Almighty God “. So if they believe it anyway , that makes Atheism , a religion . The atheistic nature of evolution is not only admitted but insisted upon by most of the leaders of evolutionary thought . Ernst Mayer says , “ Darwinism rejects all Supernatural means and causations “ .

A professor in the Department of Biology at Kansas State University says ,“ even if all the data points to an intelligent designer , such a hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic “ . (belief creation happened by natural , not Supernatural means)

Professor Richard Lewontin of Harvard illustrates the implicit philosophical bias against Genesis creation regardless of whether or not the facts support it. He states , We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world,

but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a prior adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door . “

In other words , because of our Atheistic viewpoint, despite the obvious facts , or lack of them, we will “ create an apparatus of investigation “ (a type of investigation that “creates” a theory) , believable to the “uninitiated”/uneducated , that denies Almighty God .

You think that’s bad , it gets even more evil than this . From Physics Today June 2000.

The following are statements by Mano Singham, physics professor and associate director at the University Center for Innovation in teaching and education at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.“

 I used to wonder whether most students were like Jamal, secretly rejecting everything I said, but acting otherwise in order to get good grades. But not many students can successfully maintain that level of dualistic thinking over a long period of time. I finally concluded that most students believe me because they trust me, they feel that I have their best interests at heart and that I would not deliberately deceive them by teaching things that I myself did not believe. They also trust the institution that awarded me a physics PhD, and the university and the physics department that hired me and allow me to teach them. And I use that trust to effectively brainwash them . 

 We who teach introductory physics have to acknowledge, if we are honest with ourselves, that our teaching methods are primarily those of propaganda. We appeal— without demonstration—to evidence that supports our position. We only introduce arguments or evidence that support the currently accepted theories, and omit or gloss over any evidence to the contrary. We give short shrift to alternative theories, introducing them only in order to promptly demolish them—again by appealing to undemonstrated counter-evidence.

We drop the names of famous scientists and Nobel prizewinners to show that we are solidly on the side of the scientific establishment.
All of this is designed to demonstrate the inevitability of the ideas we currently hold, so that if students reject what we say, they are declaring themselves to be unreasoning and illogical, unworthy of being considered as modern, thinking people. Of course, we do all this with the best of intentions and complete sincerity. I have good reasons for employing propaganda techniques to achieve belief.

I want my students to be accepted as modern people and to know what that entails. The courses are too rushed to allow a thorough airing of all views, of all evidence. In addition, it is impossible for students to personally carry out the necessary experiments, even if they were able to construct the long chains of inferential reasoning required to interpret the experimental results. So I, like all my colleagues, teach the way I do because I have little choice.

 But it is brainwashing nonetheless.

When the dust settles, what I am asking my students to do is to accept what I say because I, as an accredited representative of my discipline, profession, and academia, say it. All the reason, logic, and evidence that I use simply disguise the fact that the students are not yet in a position to sift and weigh the evidence and arrive at their own conclusions. But if students believe my views on science because of who I am and what I represent, what makes this better than believing others who also claim to speak in their best interests but give them contrary views, such as those of creationism ? “

WOW ! ! ! Using “ Trust “ and “ Propaganda “ , “

TO BRAINWASH “ students about Evolution ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 

The definition of propaganda is ; Information especially of a biased or misleading nature used to promote the point of view, beliefs or ideas of a particular group or special interest, that are wholly or at least partly false, often associated with psychological mechanisms of influencing and altering the attitude of people toward a specific cause . I almost couldn’t believe it when I stumbled upon this . There is something called The Catholic Sacred Congregation of Propaganda !

However, I guess it makes total sense since the Catholic church is the biggest promoter of misleading lies in the world .

It was established in Rome, in the 17th century, as their Counter-Reformation damage control response, to the Reformations exposure of all her false doctrines .

Often wherever there is truth exposing falsehood, propaganda is employed to brainwash the truth away and allow the falsehood to continue to exist ! That is why they are employed in connection with Evolution .

The definition of brainwash is actually a very dirty thing !

 It is a concentrated, systematic, psychological effort, usually involving propaganda and lies, to mentally manipulate, delete and change a person’s fundamental beliefs and attitudes, replacing them with new, highly biased and false data, to ultimately control the mind of the other person .

So “trust”, “propaganda” , “undemonstrated counter-evidence“ and “brainwashing” are admittedly employed to have Faith beyond FACT in Evolution ! In fact , it is well known , by almost everyone in the scientific world today , that such influential evolutionists from Charles Darwin himself , to Stephen Jay Gould , Edward Wilson of Harvard University , Richard Dawkins of England , William Provine of Cornell University and numerous other evolutionary spokesman , are dogmatic atheists ! ! !

Evolution is promoted as Faith Beyond Fact , a religion , not science ! ! ! A religion to explain Creation without a Creator.

Another blatant lie Evolutionists repeat, as if they keep saying it, people will believe it or it will somehow become true, is, no real scientist rejects Evolution.

Here is a partial list of prominent Fathers of Science who rejected Evolution and who believed in Creation ;

Physics —Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Kelvin. They knew Creation was physically impossible without a Creator !
Chemistry —Boyle, Dalton, Ramsay. They knew Creation without a Creator, doesn’t mix !
Biology —Ray, Linnaeus, Mendel, Pasteur, Virchow, Agassiz. They knew there is no life, without a Life-Giver !
Geology —Steno, Woodward, Brewster, Buckland, Cuvier. They knew all the rock hard physical evidence supports existence of a Creator !
Astronomy—Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Herschel, Maunder. They knew there is no heavens without a Heaven !
Mathematics —Pascal, Leibniz, Euler.

They knew Creation without a Creator doesn’t add up !

Here is a partial list of prominent early scientists who believed in Creation ;

Francis Bacon, 1561-1626. Considered among the fathers of empiricism and is credited with establishing the inductive method of experimental science what is now called the “ scientific method “, something the theory evolution has never passed in 217 years !

William Turner 1508 – 1568 called the Father of English botany was also a ornithologist. He could see the Power that makes things grow !

Otto Brunfels, 1488 – 1534: German botanist, one of Europe’s fathers of botany.

Galileo Galilei, 1564 – 1642 Italian astronomer, physicist, and mathematician.

He figured out who was responsible for Creation.

Lawrentis Gothus, 1565 – 1646 professor of astronomy and Archbishop of Uppsala.

Blaise Pascal, 1623 – 1662: Author of Pascal’s Law(physics), Pascal’s Theorem(math) and Pascal’s Wager(Theology).

Isaac Barrow, 1632 1677: English scientist and mathematician.

Stephen Hales, 1677 – 1761: Copley medal winning scientist for the study of plant physiology. Also inventor of a patented ventilation system, a means to distill sea water, and ways to preserve meat.

Albrecht Von Haller, 1708 to 1777: Swiss anatomy and physiology professor, known as the father of modern physiology.

Robert Boyle, 1627-1691: Prominent scientists and theologian who early on argued that the study of science would improve glorification of Almighty God. What a visionary Mr. Boyle was as the recent discoveries of The Information Age and the facts listed previously have done just that !

John Ray, 1627-1705.

English botanist who wrote the wisdom of Almighty God manifested in the works of Creation. He knew Romans 1:20, “ The creation of the world Almighty Gods invisible qualities- His eternal power and divine nature- have been clearly seen … “

Emanuell Swedenborg, 1688-1772. Did much scientific research with the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, conceived the Nebular Hypothesis to explain the origin of the solar system.

Mary Anning, 1799 and 1847 famous paleontologist.

Edward Hitchcock 1793 to 1864 geologists and paleontologists, also a pastor !

 His digging in the ground turned up nothing to stop him from preaching the Word of The Creator.

Benjamin Silliman 1779 to 1864: First person to distill petroleum. An Early outspoken old Earth Creationist.

Bridgewater Treatises, 1800’s: Series of Britain’s best scientific minds publishing papers proving the existence of The Creator. Just a few were;

William Kirby,1759 to 1850: Entomologist.

William Buckland, 1784 to 1856: Geologist and Paleontologist.

William Whewell, 1794-1866: Polymath scientist. There were many more but info very hard to find due to copyright laws.

 Here is a partial list of famous scientists believing in Creation after Darwin ;

Alessandro Volta, 1745-1827. Inventor of the electric battery and who the term volt is named after. Evidently he knew where the source of power in Creation lies !

Louis Pasteur, 1822-1895. Chemical bacteriological scientist, inventor of pasteurization. His thinking was pure !

Belfour Stewart, 1828-1887. studied electricity in the ionosphere. He knew where the power of the Heaven came from !

A.H. Sayce, 1845-1933. Archaeologist. He kept digging for the truth !

Dr. Clifford Burdick, 1919-2005, geologist. He saw The Creator laid the groundwork !

Dr. Lewis Merson Davies, 1890-1943. soldier, geologist, paleontologists, author and controversial re-awakening of the anti-evolutionary debate in England .

He fought at ground level for credit to The Creator !

Paul Lemoine, 1878-1940, geologist.

Edward H. Maunder, 1851-1928, Astronomer. He gave credit for the heavens to Heaven !

William Mitchell Ramsay, 1851-1939, archaeologist.

Wernher von Braun, 1912-1977, rocket engineer for Nazi Germany, then after WWII, NASA chief rocket engineer for the Saturn V rocket that propelled men to the Moon . It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to acknowledge The Creator !

Albert Einstein, Theoretical Physicist, Inventor of The Theory of Relativity, genius.

It doesn’t take a genius to believe in The Creator !

Arthur Wilder-Smith, 1915-1995, He began his education as an Atheist to earn three science doctorates, Physical Organic Chemistry from Reading University, England. Pharmacology from University of Geneva. and Engineering from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. All this knowledge in the sciences of chemistry of living things, medicine and engineering led him to be a Creation Science pioneer ! His higher learning led him to Higher Learning !

All puns respectfully intended !

Creation Scientists use their higher learning of the sciences to illustrate Creation by The Creator. (an extremely interesting current one is Dr. Hugh Ross)

Now a short partial list of the most modern scientists that believe in Creation ;

Marshall Adams PhD in biology-Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina.

Neil Adrian PhD in microbiology University of Oklahoma.

Domingo Aerden, professor of geology University of Grenada.

Braton Alfred, professor of anthropology University of British Columbia.

James Allen PhD in biology-genetics University of Edinburgh Scotland.

Janice Arion, PhD in biology- animal science Cornell University.

William Arion, professor of biochemistry Cornell University.

Eugene C. Ashby, professor of biochemistry Georgia Institute of technology.

Joseph Atkinson PhD organic chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Douglas Axe molecular ontologist director of the Biologic Institute.

Ibrahim Barsoum, PhD microbiology George Washington University.

John Baumgardner, PhD in geophysics and space physics works at Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Robert W Carter, PhD in marine biology.

Nancy M Darrall, PhD in botany University of Wales.

Leonid Korochkin, MD.

Heather Kuruvilla, PhD biological sciences, State University of New York.

Colin W. Mitchell, MA. with honors, in geography Oxford and Cambridge University. Dr. Hugh Ross, PhD in astrophysics University of Toronto. Tours extensively lecturing and has many fascinating eye-opening YouTube videos.

As more information is learned in ALL of the sciences, the list of scientists believing in Creation is growing . This is even being aided by Evolutionists that are jumping from their sinking ship, as the incoming tide of information washes bovver them I guess the arrogant die-hard Evolutionists think they know better than the many notable intelligent minds that came before them, that did not even have the benefit of all the new knowledge, that they now have, but had an open mind, not biased by Satan. These die-hard Evolutionists must be relying on faith to still believe their clearly false theory, because they sure aren’t relying on facts ! To ignore all the facts, they are just in denial or outright possessed by the author of this Demonic theory !

Many evolutionists chide creationists not because of the facts, but because creationists refuse to play by the current rules of the game that exclude supernatural creation a priori. That it is indeed a ‘game’ was proclaimed by the evolutionary biologist Richard Dickerson: “ Science is fundamentally a game. It is a game with one overriding and defining rule :

Rule #1: Let us see how far and to what extent we can explain the behavior of the physical and material universe in terms of purely physical and material causes, without invoking the supernatural . “

In practice, the ‘game’ is extended to trying to explain not just the behavior, but the origin of everything without the supernatural.

Actually, evolutionists are as inconsistent as their Theory, with respect to their own rules against invoking an intelligent designer. For example, when archaeologists find an arrowhead, they can tell it must have been designed, even though they haven’t seen the designer. And the whole basis of the SETI program is that a signal from outer space, carrying specific information, must have an intelligent source . Yet the Atheistic, naturalistic bias of many evolutionists means that they reject an intelligent source for the literally computer like , self-diagnosing and self-repairing DNA program information carried in every living cell !

If you have spent any time in a science classroom, you were no doubt taught that the formal process for the formulation and testing of ideas is known as the Scientific Method, which, by the way, the groundwork for, was laid by a believer in Creation, Francis Bacon . Time spent in science class no doubt also introduced you to the Theory of Evolution . From kindergarten, when the first dinosaur book the teacher read, said “millions of years ago…”, to high school science when you dissected something, to comparative anatomy in college; we have been immersed in the “theory” of evolution. Please note the use of the word “Theory”, and not “Law” since evolution is not a fact .

The Law of Gravity is a fact .

The Theory of Evolution is not a fact .

However, does the Theory of Evolution even pass muster according to the Scientific Method ?

In The Scientific Method , there are 4 different steps you must take to prove your theory . They are : 1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena .

2. Formulation of a hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation .
3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations .
4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments .

Evolution Theory has only reached Step #2 . This means that from observations that were made (Step #1) , the formulation of a hypotheses was made to explain how we got here . It is at this step that we stall because the hypothesis for the observations does not pass scrutiny . As more is learned by observation , the hypothesis can be refined . We therefore have a continual process of going from Step #1 to Step #2 and back again . In science , this will usually get you to Step #3 , eventually . For evolution though , it has not, and they are not even close .

Jean Baptiste Lamarck first formally conceived this theory in the early 1800’s . If in 217 years it still hasn’t made it to step 3 , it’s not going to ! This is even more amazing when you know the following. Charles Darwin did not invent the theory of evolution when he and Alfred Russell Wallace presented a joint paper to the Linnaean Society in 1858, as most people think.

Charles Darwin’s grandfather Erasmus Darwin in 1794 published a very similar book on evolution entitled Zoonomia. Before that there was James Hutton, Comte De Buffon, and even ancient Greek philosophers by the name Empedocles and Anaximander, during the dawn of scientific thought, 2600 years ago, in Ancient Greece ! So obviously if a theory has been around 2,600 years and it is still a theory, there’s something seriously flawed in that theory, that keeps it from being proven and becoming a Law of science !

There must be a reason . Under normal circumstances , the hypothesis would be discarded as rubbish . However, when it comes to evolution , the personal stakes are way too high . Without the idea that we evolved , scientists are forced to conclude that we arrived by special creation , from the hands of a Creator, and that means , He’s Almighty God, and scientists are not !

That is simply too much for there worldly educated , puffed up , vain minds to accept ! Knowledge has become their higher power ! Romans 1:22 says , “ Professing to be wise they became fools “ .

Interesting how The Creator chose to use the word professing as in professors .

Here He clearly seems to have known that worldly knowledge and science would increase pride and vanity and cause many highly educated to become arrogant and use that knowledge to deny Almighty God. Psalm 14:1 says , “ The Fool has said in his own heart there is no Almighty God . ”

The bias of evolutionary leaders

It is a fallacy to believe that facts speak for themselves—they are always interpreted according to a framework. The framework behind the evolutionists’ interpretation is naturalism—it is assumed that things made themselves, that no divine intervention has happened, and that Almighty God has not revealed to us knowledge about the past.

Evolution is a deduction from this assumption, and it is essentially the idea that things made themselves. It includes these unproven ideas: nothing gave rise to something at an alleged ‘big bang,’ non-living matter gave rise to life, single-celled organisms gave rise to many-celled organisms, invertebrates gave rise to vertebrates, ape-like creatures gave rise to man, non-intelligent and amoral matter gave rise to intelligence and morality, man’s yearnings gave rise to religions, etc.

ALL BY CHANCE ? ? ? ……. REALLY ? ? ? ?

Professor D.M.S. Watson, one of the leading biologists and science writers of his day, demonstrated the atheistic bias behind much evolutionary thinking when he wrote: “ Evolution [is] a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible. “

Even the man responsible for bringing the Theory of Evolution into mainstream acceptance, Charles Darwin, was concerned about the lack of transitional species fossils disproved his theory. He hoped that in the years to come there would be more fossil finds of these transitional species but in over 150 years that has not occurred .

Darwin also admitted that the Cambrian explosion of species would prove fatal to his theory.

Perhaps his most damning statement about his own theory, speaking of the amazing complexity, precision, and speed of the human eye, Darwin said, “ it is of extreme Perfection and complication…. I suppose that the eye with all its inevitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree. “

This was either a Freudian slip, exposing that only his, atheistic or agnostic at best, mindset, was the only thing giving him belief in his own absurd explanation of Creation, or simply a moment of clarity or vision. ( puns intended)

The famous agnostic evolutionist, astronomer Robert Jastrow, paraphrasing and reflecting on the thoughts of Darwin, said, “ the eye appears to have been designed, no designer of telescopes could have done better. How could this marvelous instrument have evolved by chance, through a succession of random events ? “

It is nice to see that someone who uses their eyes for a living, can actually see !

So it’s not a question of biased religious creationists versus objective scientific evolutionists; rather, it is the biases of the Christian religion versus the biases of the religion of secular humanism resulting in different interpretations of the same scientific data. As the anti-creationist science writer Boyce Rensberger admits: “ At this point, it is necessary to reveal a little inside information about how scientists work, something the textbooks don’t usually tell you. The fact is that scientists are not really as objective and dispassionate in their work as they would like you to think.

Most scientists first get their ideas about how the world works not through rigorously logical processes but through hunches and wild guesses. As individuals, they often come to believe something to be true long before they assemble the hard evidence that will convince somebody else that it is. Motivated by faith in his own ideas and a desire for acceptance by his peers, a scientist will labor for years knowing in his heart that his theory is correct but devising experiment after experiment whose results he hopes will support his position . “

“ Any suppression which undermines and destroys that very foundation on which scientific methodology and research was erected, evolutionist or otherwise, cannot and must not be allowed to flourish … It is a confrontation between scientific objectivity and ingrained prejudice – between logic and emotion – between fact and fiction … In the final analysis, objective scientific logic has to prevail – no matter what the final result is – no matter how many time-honored idols have to be discarded in the process … After all, it is not the duty of science to defend the theory of evolution and stick by it to the bitter end -no matter what illogical and unsupported conclusions it offers …

If in the process of impartial scientific logic, they find that creation by outside intelligence is the solution to our quandary, then let’s cut the umbilical cord that tied us down to Darwin for such a long time. It is choking us and holding us back … Every single concept advanced by the theory of evolution (and amended thereafter) is imaginary as it is not supported by the scientifically established probability concepts. Darwin was wrong… The theory of evolution may be the worst mistake made in science .”

(I L Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong – A Study in Probabilities PO Box 231, Greenvale, New York 11548: New Research Publications, Inc. pp 6-8, 209-210, 214-215. I.L.Cohen, Member of the New York Academy of Sciences and Officer of the Archaeological Institute of America). Member of the New York Academy of Sciences and Officer of the Archaeological Institute of America).

Notice at the end of Mr. Cohens stern denouncement of Evolution , he mentioned it being , “ not supported by established probability concepts “ . Even I , lacking any worldly higher learning , was led by The Creator , to use The Law of “Probability” , as foundational evidence against for The Creator and against Evolution ! It is also important to note this man is “ Officer of the Archeological Institute of America “ . If he is saying this, despite the so-called archeological evidence used to support Evolution, that must tell you something about that , so-called evidence ! That so-called evidence will be explored in chapter 12a .

British Novelist, poet, medievalist, literary critic, essayist, lay theologian, broadcaster, lecturer and Christian C.S. Lewis, who died in 1963 also pointed out that even our ability to reason would be called into question if atheistic evolution were true: “ If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision, then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident, and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too. If so, then all our thought processes are mere accidents, the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms.

And this holds for the materialists’ and astronomers’ as well as for anyone else’s. But if their thoughts, i.e., of Materialism and Astronomy are merely accidental by-products, why should we believe them to be true ? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents . “

Here is some more recent evidence against Evolution ;

Scientists have done long-term evolutionary experiments by taking yeast and other bacteria and watching them over 30 years. 30 years of bacterial evolution is equal to 1.5 million years of higher species or human evolution. These 30-year experiments have only proven how extremely limited evolution is in bringing about change !

On another experiment sheep are put on an island and allowed to reproduce over several generations for 30 or 40 years. Even the DNA differentiation is always far less than the Darwinian model and there were no species differentiation at all . This again says living things are not morphing or mutating into hybrid, cross-species, like some Frankenstein experiment ! Genesis 1:24-26 states, “ And Almighty God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so. Almighty God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And Almighty God saw that it was good. Then Almighty God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”

After their “kind” (species) , not evolving one to another ! The Creator created a multitude of different living creatures “after their kind”. He made cattle after the cattle kind, dogs after the dog kind and cats after the cat kind, but notice he made man, uniquely differently, after the Almighty God kind , “ in Our Image, in our Likeness “ (Our meaning God the Father and Christ)

Man is first created in Almighty God’s “image”, in other words, in Almighty God’s physical form and shape, out of the physical elements of the Earth. However he is uniquely different, from all other living creatures, in that, he has the human spirit to think, reason and create and be aware of his Creator, having the potential to be in the image of his Creators character, by choosing to seek his Creator and have his mind and spirit impregnated by The Creator’s Holy Spirit ! Finally thru a Resurrection change, physical humans may be totally transformed into Immortal spirit, in the “likeness” of Almighty God, transformed fully into the Almighty God kind !

The spirit of evolution tries to undo all this by reducing Man to a beast ! Its underlying spirit is satanic ! Here is another illustration of how unique Man is. When an animal gives birth it isn’t taken to the hospital, there is no doctor, obstetrician or midwife. The father is usually nowhere to be found and it is born without any assistance out in the field or in a barn. The newborn comes out, staggers to his feet and somehow finds its first dinner, at its mother’s teat . They do this because The Creator has given them instinct . Human babies on the other hand do not have this preprogrammed instinct . A baby left to itself at birth would soon die.

They need parents to do everything for them, to love, teach them everything and care for them . They need family. Although the human baby physically matures much slower than an animal, its potential is infinitely greater. Instead of having a mere animal brain with pre-programmed instinct, The Creator endowed the human brain, with the human spirit, a mind. Job 32:8 states, “ there is a spirit in man and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding “ . Unlike the animal brain only the human mind, through the gift of The Creator’s human spirit, has the ability to think, reason, imagine, plan, design, make judgments and decisions and exercise willpower and self-discipline.

At Birth the human brain is like an empty computer hard drive that has immense capacity to store and retrieve information, but it needs lots of programming. Based on what goes into the mind, a human develops a sense of moral and spiritual values. Without these values the emotional mental and physical state of the person will corrupt . The spirit controls the mind, the Mind controls the body.

Without the teaching and correcting of a family the human infant would be similar to a wild animal. A mother and father in marriage is the best recipe for a happy healthy well-adjusted adult. This is why The Creator ordained the institution of marriage. If we were mere animals, developed by Evolution, marriage would never have existed !

Regarding origin of life research, Dr. Franklin M. Harold examined at length the current state of origin-of-life research in a chapter titled “ Ultimate Riddle – Origin of Cellular Life “ in his 2014 book “ In Search of Cell History: The Evolution of Life’s Building Blocks “ published by the University of Chicago Press. He wrote:
“ Over the past sixty years, dedicated and skillful scientists have devoted much effort and ink to the origin of life, with remarkably little to show for it.
[Quoting Radu Popa, 2004,] ‘So far, no theory, no approach, no set of formulas, and no blackboard scheme has been found satisfactory in explaining the origin of life.’ At the conclusion of a century of science, whose great glory is the discovery of how living things work, there is something downright disgraceful about this confession, an intimation that despite our vast knowledge and clever technology there may be questions that exceed our grasp. But its truth is indisputable.”

Evolutionists 30 years ago said that our Ancestral Population we came from, were perhaps 1 million, then as years went by they amended that figure to 100,000, then 10,000, then 1200, now 800 or less. Do you see where this is heading ?mmPretty soon it’ll be down to two and match with what the Bible says ! Science always does eventually catch up with the Bible ! In fact physics professor, Dr. Hugh Ross, says there are over 200 cases where the Bible makes accurate predictions of future scientific discoveries ! (check YouTube)

Philosopher J. S. Mill (not a Christian) summed up where we have now come to: “ It is self-evident that only Mind can create mind.” The only rational and reasonable conclusion is that an eternal Creator is the one who is responsible for reality as we know it. Or to put it in a logical set of statements:

• Something exists.
• You do not get something from nothing.
• Therefore a necessary and eternal “something” exists.
• The only two options are an eternal universe and an eternal Creator.
• Science and philosophy have disproven the concept of an eternal universe.
• Therefore, an eternal Creator exists.

Former atheist Lee Strobel, who arrived at this end result many years ago, has commented, “ Essentially, I realized that to stay an atheist, I would have to believe that nothing produces everything; non-life produces life; randomness produces fine-tuning; chaos produces information; unconsciousness produces consciousness; and non-reason produces reason. Those leaps of faith were simply too big for me to take, especially in light of the affirmative case for God’s existence … In other words, in my assessment the Christian worldview accounted for the totality of the evidence much better than the atheistic worldview. “

But the next question we must tackle is this: if an eternal Creator exists (and we have shown that He does), what kind of Creator is He ? Can we infer things about Him from what He created ? In other words, can we understand the cause by its effects ? The answer to this is yes, we can, with the following characteristics being surmised:

• He must be supernatural in nature (as He created time and space).
• He must be powerful (exceedingly).
• He must be eternal (self-existent).
• He must be omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it).
• He must be timeless and changeless (He created time).
• He must be immaterial because He transcends space/physical.
• He must be personal (the impersonal cannot create personality).
• He must be infinite and singular as you cannot have two infinites.
• He must be diverse yet have unity as unity and diversity exist in nature.
• He must be intelligent (supremely). Only cognitive being can produce cognitive being.
• He must be purposeful as He deliberately created everything.
• He must be moral (no moral law can be had without a giver).
• He must be caring (or no moral laws would have been given).

These things being true, we now ask if any religion in the world describes such a Creator. The answer to this is yes: the God of the Bible fits this profile perfectly. He is supernatural (Genesis 1:1), powerful (Jeremiah 32:17), eternal (Psalm 90:2), omnipresent (Psalm 139:7), timeless/changeless (Malachi 3:6), immaterial (John 5:24), personal (Genesis 3:9), necessary (Colossians 1:17), infinite/singular (Jeremiah 23:24, Deuteronomy 6:4), diverse yet with unity (Matthew 28:19), intelligent (Psalm 147:4-5), purposeful (Jeremiah 29:11), moral (Daniel 9:14), and caring (1 Peter 5:6-7).

One last subject to address on the matter of God’s existence is the matter of how justifiable the atheist’s position actually is. Since the atheist asserts the believer’s position is unsound, it is only reasonable to turn the question around and aim it squarely back at him. The first thing to understand is that the claim the atheist makes—“ no god “, which is what “ atheist ” means—is an untenable position to hold from a philosophical standpoint. As legal scholar and philosopher Mortimer Adler says, “ An affirmative existential proposition can be proved, but a negative existential proposition—one that denies the existence of something—can not be proved. “

For example, someone may claim that a red eagle exists and someone else may assert that red eagles do not exist. The former only needs to find a single red eagle to prove his assertion. But the latter must comb the entire universe and literally be in every place at once to ensure he has not missed a red eagle somewhere and at some time, which is impossible to do. This is why intellectually honest atheists will admit they cannot prove God does not exist.

It is ironic that the argument parroted by today’s atheists originated by famous atheists of history, most notably Sigmund Freud, Frederick Nietzsche, Karl Marx, that anyone who believes in a Creator , had some sort of mental defect , is actually proven to be true , of atheists themselves . This is a classic deployment of the 6th of Satan’s 6 types of Lies, deflection. Deflection is the last ditch attempt at keeping a lie alive by turning it around and saying the other person is what in fact they are . The other 5 are; Deception, Distortion, Denial, Delusion, Distraction . It is no coincidence that they all start with ‘D’ as does Devil and there are six which is his number of the Beast 666 .

Atheists are Deceived there is no Creator . They have a Distorted understanding of the facts . They are in Denial of the existence of a Creator . They are in Delusion to believe that it is truth that there is no Creator . They are Distracted from the truth from the supposed respected notability of those famous atheists that came before them . So the last resort is to try to turn the tables and say we, who know The Creator exists, are mentally deficient somehow . It’s not their fault though, due to the nature of the atheists belief, they have fallen victim to all 6 of Satan’s Stronghold Fortress of Lies !

It is well known , by almost everyone in the scientific world today , that such influential evolutionists from Charles Darwin himself , to Stephen Jay Gould , Edward Wilson of Harvard University , Richard Dawkins of England , William Provine of Cornell University , Stephan Hawking ,and numerous other evolutionary spokesman, are dogmatic atheists ! ! !

The first two tenets of Humanist Manifesto I (1933), signed by many prominent evolutionists, are:

1.Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created.

2.Humanism believes that Man is a part of nature and has emerged as a result of a continuous process.

It’s no accident that the leaders of evolutionary thought were and are ardently opposed to the notion of the Christian Almighty God as revealed in the Bible. Stephen Jay Gould and others have shown that Darwin’s real purpose was to destroy the idea of a divine designer. (C. Wieland, Darwin’s Real Message: Have You Missed It Creation 14(4):16–19, September–November 1992) This explains Darwins re-development and support of the Theory of Evolution, despite his own doubts in it ! Richard Dawkins applauds evolution because he claims that before Darwin it was impossible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist, as he says he is. (R. Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design, (NY: W.W. Norton, 1986), p. 6)

A recent survey published in the leading science journal Nature conclusively showed that the National Academy of Sciences, had a survey of all 517 NAS members in biological and physical sciences resulted in just over half responding: 72.2% were overtly atheistic, 20.8% agnostic, and only 7.0% believed in a personal Creator God. Belief in Almighty God was lowest among biologists. It is likely that those who didn’t respond were unbelievers as well, so the study probably underestimates the level of anti-God belief in the NAS. The percentage of unbelief is far higher than the percentage among U.S. scientists in general, or in the whole U.S. population.

Many atheists have claimed to be so, precisely because of evolution ! For example, the evolutionary entomologist and sociobiologist E.O. Wilson (who has an article in Teaching about Evolution on page 15) said:

“ As were many persons from Alabama, I was a born-again Christian. When I was fifteen, I entered the Southern Baptist Church with great fervor and interest in the fundamentalist religion; I left at seventeen when I got to the University of Alabama and heard about evolutionary theory “. (E.O. Wilson, The Humanist September/October 1982, p. 40)

Many people do not realize that the teaching of evolution propagates an anti-biblical religion. If teaching a belief in a Creator is religion, then teaching creation without a Creator must be a religion . This is exactly what evolution teaches. Many humanist leaders are quite open about using the public schools to proselytize their faith. This might surprise some parents who think the schools are supposed to be free of religious indoctrination, but this quote makes it clear: “ I am convinced that the battle for humankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly perceive their role as the proselytizers of a new faith: a religion of humanity that recognizes and respects the spark of what theologians call divinity in every human being .

These teachers must embody the same selfless dedication as the most rabid fundamentalist preachers(?), for they will be ministers of another sort, utilizing a classroom instead of a pulpit to convey humanist values in whatever subject they teach, regardless of the educational level—preschool day care or large state university. The classroom must and will become an arena of conflict between the old and the new—the rotting corpse of Christianity(?), together with all its adjacent evils and misery(?), and the new faith of humanism … .

It will undoubtedly be a long, arduous, painful struggle replete with much sorrow and many tears, but humanism will emerge triumphant. It must if the family of humankind is to survive. “ (J. Dunphy, A Religion for a New Age, The Humanist, Jan.–Feb. 1983, 23, 26 (emphases added), cited by Wendell R. Bird, Origin of the Species Revisited, vol. 2, p. 257) Wow, nice choice of words and phrases ! Do you see the underlying spirit here ?

In insanely derogatory anti-Christian words like; “ rotting corpse of Christianity “, “ rabid fundamentalist preachers “ and, Satanic supportive words like; creating a, “ new faith of humanism “ by being “ the proselytizers of a new faith(?): a religion… “of”….. “ divinity in every human being(?)“ , “ ministers of another sort(?), utilizing a classroom instead of a pulpit to convey humanist values in whatever subject they teach, regardless of the educational level—preschool, day care or large state university. “ So, start brainwashing children with humanistic/Atheistic ideas in preschool, on thru college !

Remember Mano Singham, physics professor and associate director at the University Center for Innovation in teaching and education at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio said we use “trust” , “propaganda” and “brainwashing” ?

Since teachers of Evolution are referred to here as “ Ministers of another sort “, 2^nd Corinthians 11:14-15 is appropriate, “ And no marvel, for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light (knowledge), Therefor it is no great thing if his ministers (teachers)also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness (right knowledge) whose end shall be according to their works “ . In other words, Satan has ministers/teachers masquerading as true and good ministers/teachers of “righteousness”(“light”/truth/right knowledge). Add up the facts; Satan is the god of this world. (2^nd Corinthians 4:4) The educational system is therefore heavily biased by Satan. Therefore that is why it gave birth to the preposterous Satanic fabricated lie of the Theory of Evolution to explain Creation without a Creator, reducing man to a beast, as Satan is.

This is why most scientists, teachers and professors are predominantly Atheists, clearly evidenced by their teaching techniques being admittedly biased, prejudiced, selective, targeted, toward being Atheistic, humanistic, materialistic. They admittedly use “Trust”, “Propaganda”, “Brainwashing” to achieve their goal of denying Almighty God.

They admittedly use their “classroom as a pulpit to convey these humanistic values”, as “ministers of another sort” just as “Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light (knowledge), Therefor it is no great thing if his ministers (teachers)also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness”. (“light”/truth/right knowledge). They begin this diabolical process in “preschool” thru “large state university”, to “brainwash” belief in a Creator God, out of them, effectively creating educated Atheists ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Evolution is promoted as Faith Beyond Fact , a religion , not science ! ! ! ! ! ! ! It is an ideology , a secular religion , a full-fledged alternative to Christianity ! Will Provine at Cornell University is another scientist who frankly acknowledges this . “ As the creationists claim, belief in modern evolution makes atheists of people. One can have a religious view that is compatible with evolution only if the religious view is indistinguishable from atheism “ Well I guess that’s pretty matter of fact and out in the open

One can have a religious view that is compatible with evolution only if the religious view is indistinguishable from atheism “ Well I guess that’s pretty matter of fact and out in the open .Evolution is Faith BEYOND FACT ! It is a religion ! In fact , it is well known , by almost everyone in the scientific world today , that such influential evolutionists from Charles Darwin himself , to Stephen Jay Gould , Edward Wilson of Harvard University , Richard Dawkins of England , William Provine of Cornell University , Stephan Hawking ,and numerous other evolutionary spokesman , are dogmatic atheists ! ! ! Evolution is their religion of faith, since there are not any facts to support it !

The theory of evolution has totally failed to explain why modern man suddenly appeared on the scene 6 or so thousand years ago .

The so-called Missing Link has never been found nor ever will be .Now in the information age, Satan has, in these latter days, been tempting mankind to look elsewhere for the missing link, because even the Devil himself knows there is no Missing Link in the fossil record, so he has inspired man to look to extraterrestrials The only thing out of this world about this, is the origins of this theory, being from the spirit world .

One of Darwin’s own teachers, Adam Sedgwick, warned that humanity under the influence of evolutionary thought “ would abandon all the moral codes that allowed civilization to survive ” . (Carl Zimmer, commentary within Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2007, p. 151).

Here is what Viktor Frankl, a Holocaust survivor, had to say about the influence of evolutionary thought in the development of the holocaust: “ The gas chambers of Auschwitz were the ultimate consequence of the theory that man is nothing but the product of heredity and environment—or, as the Nazi liked to say, of ‘Blood and Soil.’ I am absolutely convinced that the gas chambers of Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Maidanek were ultimately prepared not in some Ministry or other in Berlin,

but rather at the desks and in the lecture halls of nihilistic scientists and philosophers ”. (The Doctor and the Soul: From Psychotherapy to Logotherapy,1986, p. xxvii).

The Nazis were determined to make sure that the Jews didn’t survive and “evolve any further.” So senior officials of the Nazi regime held a conference in 1942 at Wannsee, Germany, a suburb of Berlin, to lay out “ the final solution ” and inform administrative leaders of departments responsible for various policies relating to Jews. One of the most significant statements of their official policy was as follows: “ In the course of the final solution and under appropriate leadership, the Jews should be put to work in the East. In large, single-sex labor columns, Jews fit to work will work their way eastward constructing roads.

Doubtless the large majority will be eliminated by natural causes.(Worked to death) Any final remnant that survives will doubtless consist of the most resistant elements. They will have to be dealt with appropriately, because otherwise, by natural selection, they would form the germ cell of a new Jewish revival ” . (Mark Roseman, The Wannsee Conference and the Final Solution,2002, p. 101).

Social Darwinism and its effects

Darwinian evolutionists believe that life evolved. Social Darwinism is the idea that ruthless, atheistic egotism is the most successful policy. In other words, each individual’s best course of action is to take care of oneself, regardless of the consequences for others. Besides saying life evolves not only biologically and socially, but also intellectually and culturally. And those people deemed superior to others in these various ways are reckoned as having more of a right to life. Therefor mans law, government and religion evolved, that means there are no absolutes.

This makes for an “ anything goes ” society. You can do whatever you want. Superiors can kill inferiors in innocence, as the thinking goes—and as has been the practice of a number of genocidal governments. The theory of evolution, the atheism/Atheists it produces, and the social Darwinism it has led to, have resulted in a world that has turned its back on God. This is a world tumbling toward a time of great trouble as foretold by Christ.

The second seal of Revelation prophesies a time of unparalleled suffering, culminating in horrendous war: “ When he opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature call out, ‘Come !’ And out came another horse, bright red; its rider was permitted to take peace from the earth, so that people would slaughter one another; and he was given a great sword ” (Revelation 6:3-4, New Revised Standard Version).

This sobering vision depicts a bloody world brought about by the empty premise of Darwinian evolution, that men are animal beasts, without a purpose, causing mankind’s disbelief in his Creator ! Now can you see how truly evil this theory is ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

If all of these compelling facts do not reveal to you that Evolution is a Satanic Faith Beyond Fact religion, based on trust, propaganda and brainwashing to explain creation without a Creator, designed to make atheists out of people, then perhaps a picture will paint a thousand words , more clearer for you .

Notice a 14^th-century Islamic horned goat Demon figure, with the Devil to his right and a jackal to his left, displaying same 666 handsign as Darwin . Yes, the fingers do form 3-6’s and/or Devil horns ! Once again pretty matter of fact !

Creation is the factual documentation of all that is, and its facts are proven by science more and more as time goes by ,it has no contradictions, it never changes, it is perfect, purposed design, it is something from someone, it is life from the Eternal Life, that is The Creator. It is Truth !

Here is some final Holy Words of Truth from The Creator Himself, aimed right at Evolutionists, Geologic Evolutionists and any vain scientist that thinks or teaches Creation without a Creator. “ The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.

For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but became vain in their imaginations and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles “ Rom 1:18-23.

Interesting how Almighty God chose to use the word professing as in professors .

Almighty God here clearly seems to have known that worldly knowledge and science would increase their pride and vanity and cause us to become arrogant and use that knowledge to deny Almighty God. Psalm 14:1 says, “ The Fool has said in his own heart there is no Almighty God . ” Look how foolish we as humans appear as we have gained so much knowledge but at the same time worldwide conditions grow worse and worse , as we rely on our useless God, mans worldly knowledge !

In fact mans increasing knowledge has produced Nuclear bombs, chemical weapons, and sophisticated mechanized weaponry for land, sea and air, that threaten the very survival of humanity !

Next Page >